Tag: san diego

  • Border Fire Victims – County Waives Rebuilding Fees

    Border Fire Victims – County Waives Rebuilding Fees

    San Diego — People who lost homes and buildings in East County’s Border fire will get some financial relief when they rebuild, along with assistance cleaning up the damage.

    San Diego County supervisors agreed to waive two building-related expenses, cutting the monetary burden that comes with rebuilding a burned property, and give victims trash bins so that they can dispose of fire-damaged property.

    Five homes and 11 other buildings on eight properties were destroyed by the Border fire, a blaze that started on June 19 near state routes 94 and 188. Cal Fire said more than 7,600 acres were burned and firefighters were approaching 100 percent containment as of late Tuesday afternoon.

    “It’s an absolute tragedy for anyone who has lost everything and to put ourselves in that position is very difficult unless you have been there,” Supervisor Dianne Jacob said at Tuesday’s board meeting. She emphasized that the benefit will only be available for legally rebuilt structures.

    Supervisors unanimously agreed on Tuesday to waive the fees and to provide the trash bins.

    Thousands of firefighters helped fight the blaze and there were evacuations in Potrero, Lake Morena, Campo and other areas near the border with Mexico. Residents were allowed to go back to their homes on Thursday. The cause of the fire has not been determined but is being investigated.

    People who lost buildings have to clear debris from their property before they can rebuild, and the supervisors’ decision will provide them with trash bins to make it easier to dispose of their waste.

    “Removal of debris can be very expensive to a homeowner,” said Jacob, whose district includes the fire area.

    There are also tentative plans for a hazardous waste disposal event in Potrero, but details have not been finalized, she said.

    Waivers for the plan check review and permit fees are intended to help ease some of the financial hardship that comes with rebuilding a property burned in a fire.

    “Today’s actions are intended to remove some financial and logistical hurdles these survivors might otherwise face,” Jacob said in a memo to other supervisors.

    The cost of the plan check and permit fees vary depending on the type and size of the structure being built, but expenses generally range from around $1,000 and up. The current budget does not include funds for the bins or the financial waivers, but supervisors instructed county staff to alert them if they need to allocate money.

    Victims would only be able to rebuild structures of roughly the same size and location within unincorporated parts of the county burned by the fire.

    The fire is an anomaly for this time of the year, but will likely be a preview of future blazes, Jacob said.

    “This kind of fire usually does not happen this time of year, this is usually in September, October. The good news is it will create a fire break for those areas that have not burned, and it’s a real wake-up call for everybody,” she said.

    Tuesday’s decision only applies to the Border fire area and does not give relief to victims of wildfires to come. While there will very likely be fires later this year, Jacob said supervisors are able to quickly intervene when a backcountry blaze damages property. Providing assistance on a case-by-case basis allows them to officially define the boundaries of the burned area in order to direct assistance, she said.

    “We don’t lose any time in serving people who have needs by putting it on a board agenda. But it makes it public and gets the word out,” Jacob said.

    joshua.stewart@sduniontribune.com

    http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/2016/jun/28/county-waives-rebuilding-fees-for-border-fire/

  • San Diego Couple Goes with Prefab Construction

    San Diego Couple Goes with Prefab Construction

    San Diego Couple Builds Their Home Using Prefab Construction to Avoid Standard Costs

    Location: Carmel Valley Road, Del Mar Terrace

    Description: 4,000 square feet in two-story configuration on 60-foot-wide lot

    Manufacturer: Guerdon Enterprises, Boise, Idaho

    General contractor: Lusk Custom Design & Construction, San Diego

    Architect: Joseph Remick, Orinda

    Cost:

    Modules: $646,000

    Transportation and installation: $21,000

    Other costs: $350,000

    Total: $1,017,000

    Source: Lusk Custom Design & Construction

    When Cliff Hanna and his wife, Lana Le, bought a dream lot overlooking Torrey Pines State Reserve, they hired an architect to design a dream home to match.

    The trouble was that the price tag came out at $2 million.

    “The cost was way too much to build,” Hanna said. “We couldn’t afford it.”

    So the couple turned to Hanna’s father, Charles Hanna, a civil engineer who recommended a cheaper construction method: modular housing.

    This week, the results of that detour from standard, site-building construction will arrive. A caravan of flatbed trucks will deliver four modules built in Boise, Idaho. A crane will place them on a concrete foundation, constructed over the past six months, in a matter of hours.

    Then, over the next three months, Lusk Custom Design & Construction will complete a connecting structure and install the appliances, fixtures and flooring. The Hannas hope to move in by early summer.

    Total projected cost: $1,017,000. Time from start to finish: nine months.

    Compare that with the 12 months or more it takes to build a comparable custom home and it’s easy to see why modular might be the wave of the future as the U.S. home-building industry shakes off the recession.

    “The overall housing market has seen a decline,” said Tony Gacek, executive director of the National Association of Home Builders’ Building Systems Councils. “But in this decline, I think builders are learning more and more that they need to find very cost-effective, streamlined ways to produce quality homes for consumers.”

    Hanna’s house is not like the Sears kit-built homes popular in the early 20th century: Order a cottage from the catalog and it’ll be shipped in pieces for assembly. Nor is it a triple-wide mobile home that can fly apart in a windstorm or burn to a crisp in a wildfire.

    This house, contains 25 percent more lumber, making it strong enough to withstand the 750-mile journey from Idaho and the stresses that occur when the modules are lifted into place.

    From what the designers, manufacturers and builders say, modular homes are built of the same raw materials used in traditional on-site projects. The cabinetry, appliances, fixtures, flooring, paint and all other components are no different from what’s found in any tract home.

    And in the Hannas’ case, there will be some energy-saving, environmentally sustainable features, such as a solar-power system to generate electricity and bamboo flooring, that builders are touting.

    Proponents of modular housing argue that building in a factory reduces waste; protects against rain, wind and other inclement weather; and offers better quality control through constant in-house company inspection as well as the usual licensed inspectors who enforce California’s stringent building code.

    Hanna learned all this as he researched modular housing and visited the manufacturer. He acknowledged that the original, architect-designed plan might have been more attractive, but he’s content with the modular alternative, which will still include decks, patios and a 20-foot atrium bridging the modules. The price tag, of course, was the best part of this experiment.

    “We’re all looking for affordable housing, and this is one way to do it,” Hanna said.

    There are downsides to modular construction. The imagination of the architect is somewhat limited by what a factory can churn out, though Hanna’s architect, Joseph Remick of Orinda, said he was able to custom-design the second-floor modules within the limitations of what can be transported from the factory.

    Another difference is that slight changes can be made on site when building from scratch; construction drawings often differ from conditions on the ground, and last-minute adjustments are necessary. But modular units and their foundations must be precisely aligned. For the Hanna house, the modules must fit exactly onto 13 sets of 28-inch-long bolts embedded in concrete. There is only one-sixteenth of an inch in wiggle room.

    Even with all the advances in technology, only 3 percent of single-family homes built in 2008 — 23,000 out of 819,000 — were classified as modular, according to the U.S. census. That’s down from a high of 46,000 in 2002.

    But it’s no secret that most homes built these days contain modular components — from building trusses to kitchen cabinets and window frames. Every builders show attracts hundreds of such manufacturers.

    Dan Horne, spokesman for Guerdon, said his company began with mobile homes in the early 1950s and branched out into modular construction in recent years.

    “We wanted to participate in more mainstream and diversified types of modular products,” Horne said.

    He added that with Guerdon’s capacity of producing 800 homes per year, business is down about 50 percent from the peak and is dominated by multifamily military housing orders; 10 percent to 15 percent comes from custom orders, such as the Hannas’. The company employs about 130 people.

    Steve Lusk, who has spent most of his career constructing standard, site-built homes, said he hopes the Hanna house will offer a new line of business for him and other builders.

    “It’s not the first time someone has done modular housing in San Diego,” he said. “But a custom modular, we can’t find anyone to own up to it.”

    Lusk said the costs should appeal to clients who wish to go modular.

    “You’re not going to find many custom builders that will sell a custom home for under $200 per square foot,” he said. “They’re going to be between $200 and $300, depending on how nice they are.”

    The Hannas’ home will come in at about $175 per square foot, not counting the “soft costs” for planning, inspection and site work.

    “I’m convinced it’s a better way to build,” Lusk said. “It’s quicker, requires less supervision.”

    Kelly Broughton, director of the city of San Diego’s Development Services Department, said he and his staff are familiar with modular construction and agree that it offers many advantages.

    “Some countries have adopted it a lot more than the U.S.,” but it might gain popularity as more examples become available, Broughton said. He also said modular fits the city’s “green” and “clean technology” agenda.

    As for Hanna, he said he believes in modular as a way to go, but his wife, a physician, is waiting to see what the finished product feels like before she is convinced that the result is as satisfactory as a traditionally built home.

    Many a marriage goes sour when couples embark on a major remodeling or custom-home project, so speeding up the process through modular construction at least reduces the tension time.

    “We’re doing OK, but it’s definitely not easy,” Hanna said.

    The typical differences between plan and construction cannot be tolerated, since the modules have to sit exactly on the foundation as the plan specifies; 13 sets of 28-inch-long bolts embedded in concrete have to fit into the modules with no more than a 1⁄16th inch tolerance allowed.

    Reprinted from San Diego Union Tribune

    Contact your local Prefab Construction Expert:  USModular, Inc. for more information

    info@usmodularinc.com

    888-987-6638

    http://patch.com/california/oceanside-camppendleton/san-diego-couples-goes-prefab

Call Now Button